Comments on: SPURS LOOK BAD AGAINST LAKERS http://www.onemanfastbreak.net/2009/03/13/spurs-not-looking-good-against-lakers/ The online journal for basketball fans everywhere Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:33:59 +0000 hourly 1 By: EddieI http://www.onemanfastbreak.net/2009/03/13/spurs-not-looking-good-against-lakers/comment-page-1/#comment-3606 EddieI Sun, 09 Aug 2009 22:12:36 +0000 http://www.onemanfastbreak.net/?p=869#comment-3606 Well, 2000 to 2009 is done and the LA Lakers are officially the team of the decade. Yes, the Lakers owned the Spurs 4 - 1 but they are also the reason the Spurs can never be legitimately called a "Dynasty" like the Three-Peat Lakers of this decade were, or the upcoming dynasty. Most years the Spurs were trying to defend their title the Lakers kicked their rear ends. And forget luck - Kobe kills the Spurs, and Fisher and Horry are legends for their clutch shooting. Please. Well, 2000 to 2009 is done and the LA Lakers are officially the team of the decade. Yes, the Lakers owned the Spurs 4 – 1 but they are also the reason the Spurs can never be legitimately called a “Dynasty” like the Three-Peat Lakers of this decade were, or the upcoming dynasty. Most years the Spurs were trying to defend their title the Lakers kicked their rear ends. And forget luck – Kobe kills the Spurs, and Fisher and Horry are legends for their clutch shooting. Please.

]]> By: jhuerto http://www.onemanfastbreak.net/2009/03/13/spurs-not-looking-good-against-lakers/comment-page-1/#comment-1934 jhuerto Sat, 23 May 2009 00:18:03 +0000 http://www.onemanfastbreak.net/?p=869#comment-1934 I just want to point out that I wrote "of this decade," meaning since 2000. So, since 2000, the Lakers ARE 4-1 against the Spurs. Last time I checked, 1999 is not part of THIS decade. Besides, '99 was a strike-shortened season so you can't compare that title with the others. I just want to point out that I wrote “of this decade,” meaning since 2000. So, since 2000, the Lakers ARE 4-1 against the Spurs. Last time I checked, 1999 is not part of THIS decade. Besides, ’99 was a strike-shortened season so you can’t compare that title with the others.

]]> By: Hellen CLARK http://www.onemanfastbreak.net/2009/03/13/spurs-not-looking-good-against-lakers/comment-page-1/#comment-283 Hellen CLARK Thu, 26 Mar 2009 20:04:52 +0000 http://www.onemanfastbreak.net/?p=869#comment-283 Good work on your blog, I love to see the effort and I am just saying keep up the good work. Good work on your blog, I love to see the effort and I am just saying keep up the good work.

]]> By: Lakers Home Tickets http://www.onemanfastbreak.net/2009/03/13/spurs-not-looking-good-against-lakers/comment-page-1/#comment-274 Lakers Home Tickets Mon, 23 Mar 2009 13:29:12 +0000 http://www.onemanfastbreak.net/?p=869#comment-274 Very nice Los Angeles Lakers information. I hope to be in Los Angeles for a game this spring. Very nice Los Angeles Lakers information. I hope to be in Los Angeles for a game this spring.

]]> By: Rob http://www.onemanfastbreak.net/2009/03/13/spurs-not-looking-good-against-lakers/comment-page-1/#comment-255 Rob Sun, 15 Mar 2009 10:02:22 +0000 http://www.onemanfastbreak.net/?p=869#comment-255 Have you actually watched the spurs over the years? If you have you would know that the regualar season really doesnt matter. To say that it wont even been close you are crazy lets take a look at last year yeah you guys beat us 4-1 with us having manu out and a no call for barry. This is what I hate about people that write or are fans of LA you make it seem like no one can compare and yeah you have beat us in the playoffs thoes years but somthing to remember is that in 2005,2006 and 2007 the lakers wernt good enough to make it to face the spurs. But its all good LA fan always thinks that they are the best and they hate that the spurs have been the best team in the last ten years but its alright our fans our media our players will always show respect for the lakers but you guys never will it really makes me ashamed to be from souther california how full of yourself all of you are Have you actually watched the spurs over the years? If you have you would know that the regualar season really doesnt matter. To say that it wont even been close you are crazy lets take a look at last year yeah you guys beat us 4-1 with us having manu out and a no call for barry. This is what I hate about people that write or are fans of LA you make it seem like no one can compare and yeah you have beat us in the playoffs thoes years but somthing to remember is that in 2005,2006 and 2007 the lakers wernt good enough to make it to face the spurs. But its all good LA fan always thinks that they are the best and they hate that the spurs have been the best team in the last ten years but its alright our fans our media our players will always show respect for the lakers but you guys never will it really makes me ashamed to be from souther california how full of yourself all of you are

]]> By: Danalyst http://www.onemanfastbreak.net/2009/03/13/spurs-not-looking-good-against-lakers/comment-page-1/#comment-251 Danalyst Sat, 14 Mar 2009 21:46:54 +0000 http://www.onemanfastbreak.net/?p=869#comment-251 How convenient a statement. let me rephase this statement from an un laker perspective but from a whole leaque persepective of where the Championship is all that matters in terms of accomplishment The Spurs and Lakers are the two dominant teams of this decade, winning a combined "seven" championships and one or the other has been involved in nine of the past Ten NBA Finals. As much as the Lakers would like to think that they are on equal footing with the Spurs, the so-called rivalry has been one-sided in favor of the guys wearing Black and Silver. In their Nine finals apperances in the last 10 years, the Spurs have a clean sweep 4 out 4, while the Lakers have a 3 win and 2 loss record ! Now that's telling the record straight from a none LA bias perspective How convenient a statement. let me rephase this statement from an un laker perspective but from a whole leaque persepective of where the Championship is all that matters in terms of accomplishment

The Spurs and Lakers are the two dominant teams of this decade, winning a combined “seven” championships and one or the other has been involved in nine of the past Ten NBA Finals. As much as the Lakers would like to think that they are on equal footing with the Spurs, the so-called rivalry has been one-sided in favor of the guys wearing Black and Silver. In their Nine finals apperances in the last 10 years, the Spurs have a clean sweep 4 out 4, while the Lakers have a 3 win and 2 loss record ! Now that’s telling the record straight from a none LA bias perspective

]]> By: JT http://www.onemanfastbreak.net/2009/03/13/spurs-not-looking-good-against-lakers/comment-page-1/#comment-250 JT Sat, 14 Mar 2009 21:28:47 +0000 http://www.onemanfastbreak.net/?p=869#comment-250 You are like the Scott Fitzgerald of blog writers. Your lack of bias is astounding. You are like the Scott Fitzgerald of blog writers. Your lack of bias is astounding.

]]> By: ben http://www.onemanfastbreak.net/2009/03/13/spurs-not-looking-good-against-lakers/comment-page-1/#comment-249 ben Sat, 14 Mar 2009 18:56:02 +0000 http://www.onemanfastbreak.net/?p=869#comment-249 you forgot to mention the 1999 western semis where the spurs swept the mighty lakers and if you want to talk about one shot effecting a playoff outcome, don't forget to mention the 2004 western semis where mr. fisher hit that 0.4. Also you cannot say that the impact of Ginobili and Bynum injuries are the same to their teams. Ginobili is a 3-time champion who is a major part of the spurs offense, as last year was the first time Bynum made it out of the first round and in recent years when the lakers have played the spurs, bynum has either been injured or has gotten in foul trouble against duncan not really making an huge impact against the spurs. But good luck sir, hopefully when the lakers make the finals with relative ease as you say they will, and they'll put up a better fight and not get embarressed as they were last year. you forgot to mention the 1999 western semis where the spurs swept the mighty lakers and if you want to talk about one shot effecting a playoff outcome, don’t forget to mention the 2004 western semis where mr. fisher hit that 0.4. Also you cannot say that the impact of Ginobili and Bynum injuries are the same to their teams. Ginobili is a 3-time champion who is a major part of the spurs offense, as last year was the first time Bynum made it out of the first round and in recent years when the lakers have played the spurs, bynum has either been injured or has gotten in foul trouble against duncan not really making an huge impact against the spurs. But good luck sir, hopefully when the lakers make the finals with relative ease as you say they will, and they’ll put up a better fight and not get embarressed as they were last year.

]]> By: Bob http://www.onemanfastbreak.net/2009/03/13/spurs-not-looking-good-against-lakers/comment-page-1/#comment-247 Bob Sat, 14 Mar 2009 16:20:15 +0000 http://www.onemanfastbreak.net/?p=869#comment-247 I can tell you are really hoping this is all true. The first quarter of that game was one sided, but if you watched the rest of it you know the Spurs clawed back and gave the Lakers a huge scare. No one seriously believes that game proved anything because the Spurs weren't even playing with their catalyst, Manu. I'll take the heart and experience of the Spurs in a 7 game series against all the young-bucks on the Lakers. I can tell you are really hoping this is all true. The first quarter of that game was one sided, but if you watched the rest of it you know the Spurs clawed back and gave the Lakers a huge scare. No one seriously believes that game proved anything because the Spurs weren’t even playing with their catalyst, Manu. I’ll take the heart and experience of the Spurs in a 7 game series against all the young-bucks on the Lakers.

]]> By: othnin http://www.onemanfastbreak.net/2009/03/13/spurs-not-looking-good-against-lakers/comment-page-1/#comment-246 othnin Sat, 14 Mar 2009 16:12:40 +0000 http://www.onemanfastbreak.net/?p=869#comment-246 Is that analysis? If you look at the record since '99 the Spurs are 2-4 in the series against the Lakers not 1-4. What about some commentary on the merits of Ginobili versus Bynum since you think they are equal. Or the recent acquisition of Gooden by the Spurs? I would like to see both teams at full strength if they meet in the playoffs and in the immortal words of Sheed: "Ball don't lie" Is that analysis? If you look at the record since ’99 the Spurs are 2-4 in the series against the Lakers not 1-4. What about some commentary on the merits of Ginobili versus Bynum since you think they are equal. Or the recent acquisition of Gooden by the Spurs? I would like to see both teams at full strength if they meet in the playoffs and in the immortal words of Sheed: “Ball don’t lie”

]]>